Scytl: Obama's Spanish Ace in the Hole

Uno…dos….tres…

Oh – what am I doing?  I’m just practicing counting votes for the 2012 presidential election, possibly the most vital election in American history.

Why am I doing it in Spanish?  Because, silly reader, American votes are tallied in Spain.  Duh.

Get ready for more election fraud.  Over 900 jurisdictions are relying on Scytl, according to its own website, “the worldwide leader in electronic voting and electoral modernization”.  Scytl is based in Barcelona, Spain and the board of directors is made up of….you guessed it, investment bankers.  As if the globalist bankers haven’t done enough damage to the US, they will now be in charge of the majority of the election.

Scytl voting is strictly internet based.  There is absolutely NO paper trail.  This leaves no room for transparency in the vote-counting process and it also leaves the election results vulnerable to hackers.  Bev Harris of Black Box Voting confirms, “With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.”

The software can definitely be hacked as was proven in 2010.  A team of University of Michigan students hacked into the system within 36 hours.  They targeted voting in Washington, DC, appropriately, and with showy, “Anonymous-style” flair, they made a joke of the entire system.  Fox News reported, “They changed votes, "elected" a Star Wars robot chairman of the City Council, and installed the school’s fight song, “Hail to the Victors,” which would play 15 seconds after someone voted.”

In 2008, the Florida Department of State considered using the Scytl system but rejected it.  

Our findings identified vulnerabilities that, in the worst case, could result in (i) voters being unable to cast votes, (ii) an election result that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters, or (iii) disclosure of confidential information, such as the votes cast by a voter. The extent to which these vulnerabilities could actually be exploited in the ODBP is beyond the scope of this report given our lack of system context. Secure handling and audit of the Voter Choice Records may defend against some or all of these vulnerabilities, but these procedures were not available for review.We identify three findings of particular significance: 

• The use of supervised polling stations provides significantly better protection against voter coercion or vote-

selling than is present in some other absentee voting systems, such as voting by mail.

• Two copies of each vote are stored: one electronically, and another on paper as a Voter Choice Record. This provides redundancy that is not present in existing vote-by-mail systems. If the electronic votes are well-protected, then they can enable audit of the paper records in ways that are not currently possible.

• After casting their ballot, each voter is given a receipt that is intended to give voters confidence that their votes were “Counted as Cast”. These receipts do not achieve their stated goal of allowing voters to “independently verify that their ballots have been correctly accounted for.” These receipts might indicate that a vote was received and decrypted by the county (a property not typically provided by current postal voting systems), but they do not provide assurance that the voter’s vote was correctly recorded.

Apparently these red flags were not enough to concern the US de facto government (or perhaps they were just added benefits?).  Scytl is the system used for absentee voting for all members of our military stationed overseas.

Michael Savage, a conservative talk show host, has blatantly stated his belief that this is a global maneuver to keep Obama in office. “It is very likely that this is the final step in Barack Obama’s corruption of the voting process.  It has the promise of enabling him and his cohorts to control the outcomes of federal elections with no accountability.  On top of that it’s one more step toward a global government.”

Indeed, the CEO of Scytl, Pere Valles, quite interestingly, spent several years working in…..Chicago as CEO of KPMG.  In fact, Valles, who is not an American citizen, is said to have donated the maximum allowable amount to Obama’s presidential campaign.  Of course, like nearly everything else in Obamaland, the donor list has been scrubbed and sanitized for public consumption. (5340 donors’ names were deleted from his contribution list).  It’s interesting to note that although Valles does not appear on the list of donors; over 120 other donors were employed by Valles at KPMG.

The primary investors in Scytl are Balderton Capital (with ties to JP Morgan), Nauta Capital, and Spinnaker SCR.  Balderton, in particular, through parent company Benchmark Capital, also donated heavily to the Obama campaign.  You can find more information here about the financial connections between Obama, the globalist bankers and Scytl.

So to summarize:

·        900 jurisdictions within the US will have their votes counted remotely in Spain.

·        There will be no paper trail of physical evidence of those votes.

·        The system has been hacked by a group of college students.

·        The major stockholders of the company are globalist bankers.

·        Scytl has distinct financial ties to the previous Obama campaign.

As our friendly neighbourhood communist, Joseph Stalin, said:

The people who cast the votes decide nothing.

The people who count the votes decide everything.
 

 

Thank you to Rowdy for the awesome resources! 

What Does It Mean When They Don't Try to Hide the Election Fraud?

Apparently, election fraud is only an outrage when it happens in other countries.

In 1985, the US invaded Panama in outrage over a fixed election in favor of Noriega.

Bush threatened Egypt with sanctions over Election Fraud in 2005.

In 2009, the US and NATO reached a consensus to sanction the rigged elections in Afghanistan.

Thousands of citizens took to the streets in Russia in protest of rigged elections in 2011.  The European Parliament  threatened financial sanctions over that same fraudulent election.

However, when this happens in the United States, no one bats an eye.

The rampant fraud in the 2012 GOP primary has all but escaped mention by the media.   Statements by Dr. Ron Paul's campaign, the primary target of the crime,  go unpublished with the exception of alternative media sites.  Small local newspapers carry stories about hundreds of dead people casting votes, but the large media conglomerates don't pick them up. 

Other countries have turned a blind eye - nobody is sending in troops to the United States to keep things honest.  No economic sanctions have been threatened.

There are no large mobs taking to the streets in irate protest. Paul supporters who protest or comment are marginalized by the media and all claims of fraudulence are written off as "sour grapes."

Where is our revolution?
Where is our outrage?
How can intelligent men and women watch this happen and do nothing about it?

Every single state that has participated thus far in the Republican primary has had accusations of impropriety, ranging from miscounts, to dead voters, to secret meetings and lost votes.  Not one voting has been unquestioned.

And yet, the American people have done nothing but sit idly by in their Lazyboys, flipping the channel to something less mentally taxing, like Jersey Shore.

Dr. Paul has intrepidly persevered through what must be terrible frustration.  He isn't giving up despite the fact that he has been cheated in EVERY SINGLE STATE.  He has continued on his mission despite being either ignored or ridiculed by the mainstream media.  His supporters are loud and active and by all rights, his grass roots campaign should be the one in the lead.

Even more alarmingly, little effort is being taken to hide the criminal activity in this election.  What does it mean when the leaders of our society blatantly ignore the laws our country was built on?  When democratic elections are so clearly and obviously rigged?  When election fraud is utterly ignored by the "justice" system?

It means that our opinion no longer matters.  It means that We, the People, have ceased to be a threat in the eyes of the Powers That Be.   Our power to govern ourselves and choose our leaders has been eliminated.  We are being condescendingly humored by the "pretend election" that is going on in an America that has already been quietly overthrown.

The unbelievable apathy of the American citizens regarding this criminal behaviour leaves us, as citizens, even more at fault than the perpetrators of the crimes.  We are allowing it to happen.

If you do not say "NO" you are giving tacit permission for the behavior.  You are allowing this fraud to continue.  You are allowing this sham of an electoral process to eliminate your voice. 

It's late in the game, readers, but it is not too late to resist this.  Don't let the efforts and perseverance of the Paul campaign go to waste.  Don't allow your constitutional rights as an American citizen to be removed while you stand idly by and ignore the debacle. We ARE the last line of opposition to the loss of our freedom!

Say no, and say no loudly, to this fraudulent election. 

Take action. 

RESIST.

Show the criminals in charge that they have dangerously underestimated the American people. 

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves.

~ John F. Kennedy ~



Just Let Them Vote...It's Not Like It Will Change Anything

As an American voter, do you ever get the feeling that you are being given a vote just so you feel like you have a say in what is going on in your country?  Do you ever think that the privelege of voting has become a condescending pat on the head, like a small child sitting on the lap of an adult and holding the steering wheel being told he is "driving"? Are the "powers that be" just humoring us to keep us quiet until their agenda is satisfied and their next puppet is in place in the Oval Office?

The Charlestown Post and Courier carried the story today that over 900 of the voters that allegedly voted were............

DEAD.

Those folks are not just a little sleepy.  We aren't calling them lethargic.  Legally dead, duly buried and only voting if they are doing it through a medium.

The Department of Motor Vehicles began comparing records of death certificates with the State Election Commission voting records, and interestingly enough, they've found more than 900 of said voters who are deceased.

It's amazing how this can happen in a state that REQUIRES PHOTO ID to vote!!!

The electoral process in the United States is severely compromised.  In every state that has had a primary, there have been questions about the veracity of the numbers.

How can the people trust the process that is proven to be as rife with corruption as Washington DC itself?

It was astonishing that Gingrich won the South Carolina primary, despite the interviews with his former wife that reflected horribly on his character (or lack thereof), despite the fact that he cancelled an appearance because nobody showed up to listen to him speak, despite the fact that straw polls put RON PAUL in the lead and Gingrich third to Romney.

Not only are there dead folks voting, but the entire vote in S.C. was taken electronically.  One witness said that when the votes were tallied he was not allowed to be in the same room, but had to watch the tally via a projector.

Working backwards, The Des Moines Register has announced that there are so many "missing" votes that there is no way the results in Iowa can ever be officially certified. So that primary too, is compromised.

Project Veritas volunteers in New Hampshire tested the voting system during the primaries and were given ballots when using the names of dead constituents, so apparently the dead get to vote legally in that state as well. The votes in that state have been recounted several times with several different results, rendering those results untrustworthy as well.

The electoral system is so broken that it appears to be utterly worthless. The only way to take back the elections is by going back to paper ballots and having people from each campaign responsible for hand counting the votes.  Verified photo ID must be shown.  In this day of computers and credit checks there is absolutely a fraud-resistant way to confirm the identity of the voters.

We must take back the electoral process or we will end up with another puppet to the elite with the preordained agenda of the ending the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.

What can you do to help?  I'm always a proponent of letter-writing and email campaigns.  Volunteer to do everything you can to help out with your local elections and if you see something that isn't right say something about it and don't stop saying it until everybody hears you.  Take part in the process in your area and resolve to do your part to keep the elections clean, whether or not your personal favorite candidate is the winner.  Encourage others to do the same. 

Be loud and be heard.  Let's endeavour to  keep the rest of the elections fair and accurate.  If we are not the watchdogs, who will be?